This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
(from an email by a person around at that time)
The Pixar Image computer business was sold to Vicom, not Viacom.
Vicom was, if I recall correctly, the reconstituted computer graphics
business of Gould. As I recall, Vicom's plan was to dominate
the computer graphic hardware business by buying out the
competition ( i.e., Pixar Image computer and others ) and
become the sole player in the field.
I think Vicom officially died around 1993. But they did
continue to sell and service the PIC while in business,
as well as design some of their own hardware.
PAS Section irrelevant to the Image Computer
If in the prior section PICs stopped being used in 1995, then most of these films and this section is irrelevant to the Image Computer and more appropriate just for the corporation page. It might be OK for PIC relevant films. 21:30, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
perfect images of the human body
This article uses the phrase "perfect images of the human body". The use of the word "perfect" sounds like marketing-speak. How could the images be perfect? It should be changed to something more appropriate. Tweisbach (talk) 01:32, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]