Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saltine cracker challenge

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete per nom. No cites to indicate that this is a notable cultural phenomenon rather than something made up one day. --JamesAM (talk) 06:06, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Ditto. Drmies (talk) 06:07, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I think I recall this from high school biology as a demonstration of what happens when you don't have enough amylase to dissolve a quantity of starch. It's not notable enough in its own right, though. (At best, find sources and include in an appropriate article.) TheFeds 06:44, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I'll add references myself. The fact that new editors often don't add references is one of many reasons why it is inappropriate to AfD an article one minute after it was created! Next time try cleanup tags and/or Wikipedia:Proposed deletion. And please brush up on Wikipedia:New pages patrol#New pages that may require deletion. Melchoir (talk) 06:55, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete, Merge with Competitive eating. If it goes for a delete consensus, I'll go with the crowd, but I would rather it gets merged --Cleave and Smite, Delete and Tear! (talk) 13:52, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
keep and merge needs improvement, but surely it will find its place somewhere with good references. the concept seems feasible and Google provides a multitude of entries 88.71.96.63 (talk) 14:11, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]