Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Deepmath

User talk:Deepmath

The page looks like a blog or a private web page with very little Wikipedia content. --Sjö (talk) 17:51, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It is inappropriate to delete a user talk page with multiple appropriate comments from other users. I would not object if the user's own blog-like comments were removed. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:04, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I want my main user page restored, too. It contained much information as well as links to my work on Wikipedia. If you feel that certain content was inappropriate, you could have discussed that on my user talk page before deleting my main user page. If you feel it is inappropriate to restore my main user page, please e-mail me the text so that I can place it on my own Web page independent from Wikipedia. I was not offered any input into the discussion or the opportunity to save a backup copy before my page was deleted. Deepmath (talk) 18:50, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Would "the user's own blog-like comments" be more appropriate for User:Deepmath than User talk:Deepmath, or are they inappropriate for Wikipedia altogether? Deepmath (talk) 19:54, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Answer: Yes, they are inappropriate for Wikipedia altogether per Wikipedia:User page#What may I not have on my user page?.Sjö (talk) 05:14, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Which comments, exactly, are blog-like? Deepmath (talk) 06:55, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think that you are smart enough to figure out for yourself which ones that are not appropriate. Basically, it's the same rules as on your user page.Sjö (talk) 21:31, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hej, Sjösjuk :) Deepmath (talk) 00:14, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is ridiculous. Get lost and stop pestering me! Deepmath (talk) 05:27, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]