Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ID Flow
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Harej bot (talk | contribs) at 18:02, 9 July 2009 (preventing overcategorization, Replaced: {{SUBPAGENAME}} → {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|{{subst:FULLPAGENAME}}|{{SUBPAGENAME}}|}},). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 18:02, 9 July 2009 by Harej bot (talk | contribs) (preventing overcategorization, Replaced: {{SUBPAGENAME}} → {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|{{subst:FULLPAGENAME}}|{{SUBPAGENAME}}|}},)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Recommend a new AfD to garner more consensus if concerned. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 08:59, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
ID Flow, Label Flow and Lobby Track
- ID Flow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- Label Flow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- Lobby Track (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Three software products from the same company. Little evidence of notability for any of them. Sgroupace (talk) 02:18, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. KuyaBriBriTalk 13:55, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all per nomination. These articles appear to be produced from a text template. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:23, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep all. Articles are hand-written from several sources. Products are referenced on other significant pages. Speedy deletion was already refused. Nuschler (talk) 22:57, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:21, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, (X! · talk) · @279 · 05:41, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.