Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CrossFTP Server
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Juliancolton (talk | contribs) at 01:14, 14 June 2009 (Closing debate, result was delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 01:14, 14 June 2009 by Juliancolton (talk | contribs) (Closing debate, result was delete)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 01:14, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- CrossFTP Server (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Deleted by PROD a few weeks ago. Recreated complete with old dated templates on it. No indication of notability. No independent references. Hardly any RS coverage in Google. Author seems to be a single purpose account promoting this product. Likely a COI as the author has uploaded images of the software claiming to be the copyright owner (e.g. File:Crossftp logo.jpg). See also CrossFTP, which is the corresponding client software. DanielRigal (talk) 16:54, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —DanielRigal (talk) 17:58, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This is weird. Somebody cares enough to recreate this article but nobody cares enough to vote either way on whether it should be kept. I am going to chuck a couple more delsorts on it. I don't know what happens if it still gets no votes. Perhaps it should be treated as an uncontested PROD? --DanielRigal (talk) 12:24, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. —DanielRigal (talk) 12:26, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. —DanielRigal (talk) 12:26, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete, possibly merge with CrossFTP. The only three sources I could dig up don't seem to establish standalone notability:
- http://www.cs.utexas.edu/~suriya/papers/tr-08-38.pdf (mainly page 10)
- http://www.tecchannel.de/server/news/1735532/plattformunabhaengig_crossftp_server_107/ (English translation by Google)
- http://www.computerra.ru/gid/rtfm/program/287899/ (English translation by Google) — Rankiri (talk) 16:31, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unremarkable software with no references and little independent coverage. --skew-t (talk) 11:50, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.