Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyber Evolution

Cyber Evolution

I originally PRODed this, then the creator removed it. A quick Google turned up no RSes. Deletion suggested. Ipatrol (talk) 00:30, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

there is no reason to remove it, i deleted it by accident --Orgin (talk) 01:10, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - It's just spam. Eeekster (talk) 01:54, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
strong keep - It is not spam it actually exists. www.cevo.com. i have been playing in this league for as long as it has been in operation —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.151.195.6 (talk) 02:31, 25 May 2009 (UTC) This template must be substituted.[reply]
Keep - The responses of the anon IP are doing nothing to help their cause, but a google news search turns up quite a few sources within the gaming community, including support of "CEVO" from AMD.^{CNN Money} Shadowjams (talk) 03:06, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would remind users unfamiliar with wikipedia policies to 1) Be civil to other users and they will be likely to listen to you, and 2) wikipedia has specific criteria for inclusion at WP:N. No one doubts the site exists, just question its notability. Shadowjams (talk) 03:05, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I do not see any indication of notability. - TexasAndroid (talk) 03:19, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. —TexasAndroid (talk) 03:22, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Texas Android I do not believe that you gave a real look into this. CEVO is very well known within the counter-strike and call of duty community. they are also sponsored by the AMD/ATI corporation as well as slim jim. they also have referenced affiliation with alienware — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.151.195.6 (talk • contribs)

And the sources showing this are... where? Of the four links in the references section, two are to the companies own site, one is to an "in development" page of some sort, and the last makes no mention of the subject, far as I can see. If you want to show that your product is notable, you need to provide reliable, independent, non-trivial references to establish it's notability. Without them, you are likely fighting a losing fight. - TexasAndroid (talk) 03:34, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

i don't know if you have ever heard of gotfrag before and i highly doubt it, but gotfrag is a huge news source for the competitive gaming community which is now under ownership of the mlg (major league gaming) [1] gotfrag covers all the cevo professional everns for counter-strike: source, counter-strike 1.6, team fortress 2 and cod4. i doubt you used google or any other search engine of any type to look into this. you can also probably search cevo and counter strike on youtube and you will get media coverage.