Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disarray

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 19:30, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Plain and simple dicdef; already covered in Wiktionary. KuyaBriBri^Talk 19:35, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Agreed, Wikipedia is not a dictionary and I can't think of any content for the word "Disarray" that would warrant expanding the article or that would make it noteworthy. Nutiketaiel (talk) 19:42, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Cnilep (talk) 19:58, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Wikipedia is not a dictionary. It looks like a cut-and-paste copyvio, too, but I can't find the source. JohnCD (talk) 20:08, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not a list of word definitions. $50 says its a copyvio. - 2 ... says you, says me, suggestion box 20:54, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Tim meh ! 21:35, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]