Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animate Objects
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MBisanz (talk | contribs) at 08:42, 8 April 2009 (Closing debate, result was keep). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 08:42, 8 April 2009 by MBisanz (talk | contribs) (Closing debate, result was keep)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 08:42, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Animate Objects (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I can find no notability for this band; a my space link and a youtube video do not qualify. Further, this article lists "friends and associated artists"; this leads me to believe this is some rinky-dink group that is trying to be famous. They aren't there yet. Further, this article's orphan status leads me to believe this article is purely self-promotion. Timneu22 (talk) 16:41, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:BAND T-95 (talk) 19:13, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: trivial coverage, non-notable. JamesBurns (talk) 05:41, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 20:52, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, despite the rather gushing tone of the article, this group doesn't appear to meet any of the WP:MUSIC criteria. If kept, this needs a complete rewrite. Lankiveil (speak to me) 13:26, 28 March 2009 (UTC).[reply]
*Delete per nom. Poorly written too. Deletion Mutation 15:46, 28 March 2009 (UTC) N.B. !vote of sockpuppet of blocked user struck through. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:35, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:03, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep substantial coverage ("CONCERTED SOUL; Anything goes for Animate Objects", "Animate Objects take broad view of hip-hop", "Animate Objects, illustrious hip-hop; Group raps about struggle, triumph"[1]). Icewedge (talk) 02:15, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:54, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - group won a significant award [[2]], thus establishing notability (in addition to all the articles that have been found). Untick (talk) 03:52, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Multi-nation tour, covered by multiple sources. Ronabop (talk)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.