Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animate Objects

Animate Objects

I can find no notability for this band; a my space link and a youtube video do not qualify. Further, this article lists "friends and associated artists"; this leads me to believe this is some rinky-dink group that is trying to be famous. They aren't there yet. Further, this article's orphan status leads me to believe this article is purely self-promotion. Timneu22 (talk) 16:41, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:BAND T-95 (talk) 19:13, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: trivial coverage, non-notable. JamesBurns (talk) 05:41, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 20:52, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, despite the rather gushing tone of the article, this group doesn't appear to meet any of the WP:MUSIC criteria. If kept, this needs a complete rewrite. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 13:26, 28 March 2009 (UTC).[reply]

*Delete per nom. Poorly written too. Deletion Mutation 15:46, 28 March 2009 (UTC) N.B. !vote of sockpuppet of blocked user struck through. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:35, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:03, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep substantial coverage ("CONCERTED SOUL; Anything goes for Animate Objects", "Animate Objects take broad view of hip-hop", "Animate Objects, illustrious hip-hop; Group raps about struggle, triumph"[1]). Icewedge (talk) 02:15, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:54, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]