Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SnipSnap
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MBisanz (talk | contribs) at 00:29, 2 April 2009 (Closing debate, result was redirect to List of wiki software). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 00:29, 2 April 2009 by MBisanz (talk | contribs) (Closing debate, result was redirect to List of wiki software)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of wiki software. MBisanz talk 00:29, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- SnipSnap (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Notability: questionable reliability of references. The fact that development of this project ceased in 2007 doesn't help with establishing notability. Dandv (talk) 21:56, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Dandv (talk) 22:01, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to List of wiki software where it is also mentioned. Clearly not something that had any impact - there are no 3rd party refs, nor could I find any - insufficient notability for a page of its own. I42 (talk) 23:35, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect:I agree with I42's statement here, SnipSnap does not appear to pass WP:GNG, thus does not have enough notability to justify a page of its own, nor in my opinion a merge, therefore I think a simple redirect is in order SpitfireTally-ho! 19:20, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.