Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Computer Basics
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Aitias (talk | contribs) at 22:07, 20 January 2009 (Closing debate, result was delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 22:07, 20 January 2009 by Aitias (talk | contribs) (Closing debate, result was delete)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 22:07, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Computer Basics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Wikipedia is not a text book. dougweller (talk) 13:25, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Instruction guide, textbook, FAQ and catalogue all in one. No encyclopedic value here. Valuable as it may be for someone who is looking for such things, Wikipedia is not the place for them. Chamal talk 14:13, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Looks like a copy and paste from someone's class notes. A fairly long how-to manual. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:22, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - it appears to be a copy-paste FAQ and glosssary -- Whpq (talk) 17:31, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Borderline patent nonsense. decltype 17:55, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all above (nonsense, cutting and pasting, unreferenced, WP not a manual, etc.) and the prediction of snow melting rapidly. Drmies (talk) 18:40, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete heaps of snow has fallen here. The author mistook what Wikipedia was all about. JBsupreme (talk) 04:03, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete this nonsensical 'article.' --Leoboudv (talk) 05:16, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as long as you love me so. JuJube (talk) 11:07, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A how-to manual, and not a very good one at that. Tim Ross (talk) 15:50, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.