Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warp Pipe (software developer)

Warp Pipe (software developer)

Article about trivial, third-party GameCube software with no assertion of notability. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 04:03, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:51, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:53, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge relevant information to Nintendo GameCube. As an aside, 'warp pipe' redirects to this article. Seeing as 'warp pipe' is a plausible search term, a redirect might be in order. -- Jelly Soup (talk) 08:18, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Further, while it may not be relevant to the AfD process, interested editors might find it interesting that a disambiguation page for the term 'warp pipe' was redirect to the aforementioned article. -- Jelly Soup (talk) 08:21, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 00:05, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I'm seeing a bunch of stuff come up, though I cannot and will not vouch for any for the sake of WP:RS which is what is required for WP:N. Also, Warp pipe should probably be redirected to Mario (series)#Recurring gameplay elements... --Izno (talk) 01:39, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:02, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge for reasons above. -- MISTER ALCOHOL ^T ^C 03:19, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Comment Expanding on Izno's thought, it might be better to just reestablish Warp Pipe as a disambiguation page and link it to Mario (series)#Recurring gameplay elements and Nintendo GameCube respectively. -- Jelly Soup (talk) 22:18, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is there really any need for that? It seems a bit trivial, linking no full article. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 00:06, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]