Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Workspace Macro
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SoWhy (talk | contribs) at 23:21, 20 November 2008 (Closing debate, result was no consensus). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 23:21, 20 November 2008 by SoWhy (talk | contribs) (Closing debate, result was no consensus)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. SoWhy 23:21, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Workspace Macro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Written like an advertisement, COI article creator, non-notable software.... DavidWS (contribs) 20:16, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - There's a PC World review, but the review is short and there aren't any other reviews, so this fails WP:N. No further sources could be found, although Google Book search was quite amusing for coming up with information on Workspace Macros for Microsoft Office applications. DARTH PANDAduel 01:26, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The template on the article is a redlink, that leads to the edit page of the AfD instead of the actual AfD. So it should probably be fixed.
- Delete Product description/ eadvertisement doesn't establish any notability for this product. ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:01, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 22:30, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I see sufficient notability, PCWorld, NewYorkTimes,WindowsDevCenter.Timkay20
- Comment. If you link the articles, I may be inclined to change my vote. DARTH PANDAduel 21:42, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Articles are linked now. Timkay20 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.36.227.61 (talk) 16:54, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep, it has some "notable" references... something hard to get for a piece of software SF007 (talk) 19:04, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.