Jump to content

Talk:Pope Zephyrinus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Wetman (talk | contribs) at 08:45, 26 March 2008. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconBiography Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconSaints Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Saints, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Saints and other individuals commemorated in Christian liturgical calendars on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCatholicism Start‑class
WikiProject iconPope Zephyrinus is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

A historian would note that Callixtus was Zephyrinus' deacon, that Zephyrinus began the conversion of earlier catacombs now collected under the name of Callixtus... but a historian might be too put off by the intentionally misleading, anachronistic "styles" offered here to feel much like improving this little article, so pregnant with infoboxes and weak on text. --Wetman (talk) 08:45, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]