Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KonsolScript
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jerry (talk | contribs) at 03:31, 20 January 2008 (→KonsolScript: close as delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 03:31, 20 January 2008 by Jerry (talk | contribs) (→KonsolScript: close as delete)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. JERRY talk contribs 03:31, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Self-promotional article for a scripting language created by the author (User:Creek23 aka 202.138.134.149. No references to sources not written by the author. No notability: article does not cite and Google does not find any evidence of the scripting language being used for any significant product or, in fact, anybody other than the author. Jpatokal (talk) 02:36, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- -- pb30<talk> 04:04, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- settled. 202.138.134.149 (talk) 05:53, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: this refers to the user having blanked the page in response to the AfD. This has been undone. Chris Cunningham (talk) 12:05, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for undoing but I prefer it to be redone. Please see my post for reason on http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:202.138.134.149&redirect=no 202.138.134.149 (talk) 06:14, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, I don't understand. There are only two options here: either the article is kept with its content, or it's deleted entirely. Keeping blank pages does not serve any purpose. Jpatokal (talk) 11:42, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I cannot find a delete button so I placed a settled for deletion note for administrators to do so. Yes, I prefer it to be deleted completely. Like I said, the whole article is a mess and editing it much further will be time-consuming -- anyway, self-published articles are not allowed in wikipedia. If I do the editing, I will keep violating the same rule. 202.138.134.149 (talk) 01:20, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, I don't understand. There are only two options here: either the article is kept with its content, or it's deleted entirely. Keeping blank pages does not serve any purpose. Jpatokal (talk) 11:42, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for undoing but I prefer it to be redone. Please see my post for reason on http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:202.138.134.149&redirect=no 202.138.134.149 (talk) 06:14, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: this refers to the user having blanked the page in response to the AfD. This has been undone. Chris Cunningham (talk) 12:05, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.