User talk:The Parsnip!/Archive Dec 2007
Signpost updated for November 26th, 2007.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 48 | 26 November 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:44, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Sander
Widely reported or not. This just recently happened and spreading the word that she was a porn star, and giving out her stage name, and her website are going way to far. Just keep it that she was a college student that went missing. It's called respect.Metal Head 15:02, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
- Exactly, this is an encyclopedia, that is why only the actual important facts should remain. Blabbing that she was a porn star and adding tags of american porn star/female porn star is not encyclopedia worthy. The fact that she was murdered is enclycopedia worthy. Giving out her website, for one, could actually hurt matters as it would draw bad attention.Metal Head 15:05, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
- It being reported on the news does not make it worthy of an enclycopedia. If there is a fender bender on the news it will not be in an encyclopedia. The fact that they have "widely reported" her website does not give basis to add it to the enclylopedia either. The fact that she was a porn star is not relevant.Metal Head 15:11, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Emily Sander shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Metal Head 15:11, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Saugeen Stripper
Thank you for going to bat for the article I originally wrote. I made some comments on that talk page. The actions of some of the admins here absolutely disgust me, and have been the sole reason I have not posted a thing here in nearly 2 years. Tokyojoe2002 21:00, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 3rd, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 49 | 3 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 10:13, 4 December 2007 (UTC)