Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legacy encoding
- Legacy encoding (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
While "legacy" and "encoding" are perfectly valid terms, the term "legacy encoding" does not appear to be a widely used nor accepted term. This article has no references to verify its content or to provide examples of the use of the term "legacy encoding" in the real world. —Remember the dot (talk) 22:00, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- speedy keep. Very valid and actual term. "does not appear to be a widely used" is a quite strange claim: 22,500 google hits are exactly on topic, with quite a few readily references from reliable sources, such as SourceForge, linux.org, not to say about IBM. Clearly misguided nomination, made without minimal due diligence. I added one quite comprehensive IBM reference, found after 45 seconds of google browsing. `'Míkka 23:37, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete original research, and not evidence of any sources.--SefringleTalk 03:56, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 04:07, 13 September 2007 (UTC)