Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leopard (programming language)

Leopard (programming language)

Wikipedia is not a place for people to advertise their pet projects. Camillus (talk) 14:28, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

STRONG KEEP I can't find any evidence of this being an advertisement for a pet project. The article has been around for 3 years, at least nine different Wikipedians have edited it, and no one (until now) has suggested it be deleted. Using the principles of Inclusionism and good faith edits, this article should remain. As has been suggested, it might be appropriate it to merge it with another article. KEEP IT! Truthanado 14:36, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment "Inclusionism" is not a "principle" or a policy that can be used to justify keeping an article, it is a philosophy shared by some, but not all wikipedians. Try googling for Leopard programming language, and you'll find nothing other the projects web pages and other adverts - no independent articles, books etc. This is a project knocked up by a 14 year old, as anyone who knows anything about programming can tell. Camillus (talk) 16:54, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- → AA ^(talk) — 15:42, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No sign of notability here. MarkBul 17:23, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's painful for me to write this because the technology clearly doesn't seem notable, but the subject seems to have lots of independent secondary source citations (Scoble, devshed); some of these hits are not independent (the author of the language works on a major blog) but some of them are. Tqbf 17:51, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the above notwithstanding, there is no real assertion of notability here. Eusebeus 18:41, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]