Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CMS Made Simple

CMS Made Simple

Originally prod deleted, but was contested at deletion review and restored. I have to agree with the original prod that the article fails WP:NOTABILITY. The sources that were brought up in deletion review all appear to be blog or catalog entries of one form or another which can't confer notability. --Farix (Talk) 21:17, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- KTC 22:14, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless sources are found to give notability Corpx 04:51, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources posted in the DRV: [1] [2] [3] JulesH 13:53, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I don't know how good a source Blogsweek is; the others seem OK.--Bedivere 19:31, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as insufficiently notable. No non-trivial coverage of subject by reliable, third-party published sources. I do not believe the three sources provided in the DRV qualify as references that have an established structure for fact-checking and editorial oversight. In fact, I don't even think they meet the standards for external links, much less those for reliable sources. -- Satori Son 19:51, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete purely nn and darn close to spam - had been deleted speedy as spam before, prod deletions are regularly overturned at DRV as a courtesy - just as any one editor can contest a prod. Carlossuarez46 01:13, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. Harlowraman 17:17, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]