Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SVG tools

Though it has some explanations of the software, most are just external links. This is in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy. --HAL2008 21:32, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ good faith attempt to compare vector graphics tools. Similar pages include comparison of raster graphics editors. Needs improvement and probably a tweak to the name, but not deletion. --h2g2bob (talk) 00:42, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm going to change to Merge to List of vector graphics editors and SVG, as we already have a list of vector graphics tools. A lot of the rest could be rewritten into "Support in applications" and "Support in browsers" in the SVG article. --h2g2bob (talk) 17:56, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: If it is kept, shouldn't it be moved to List of SVG tools? ~ Jeff Q (talk) 06:24, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Worthwhile information, but needs more content to meet Wikipedia standards. Perhaps should be listed on 'articles needing attention'?. DaveApter 09:07, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 12:14, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete - list of products at one point of time. WP is not DMOZ. If kept it should be renamed to "List of ..." and better yet, a historical overview would be more valuable for WP than the product list (e.g. first SVG editor, when, what features were added over time, standard compatibility over time, etc). Pavel Vozenilek 15:08, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]