Talk:Community development

Urban studies and planning Start‑class High‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Community (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Community, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CommunityWikipedia:WikiProject CommunityTemplate:WikiProject CommunityCommunity

Community building and organizing

Merging Community building and Community organizing into this article makes sense to me. All three articles are stubs and need work. I'm proposing treating Community development with good academic sources equally from the institutional side (governments, universities etc.) and from the grassroots side. I've created Category:Community development and made it even with Category:Communities. It includes as subcategories Community building and Community organizing and others. See Wikipedia:WikiProject_Community#Categories for more information, but let us know here what you think. OK? CQ 15:23, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An argument for merging community building could be made (although I am much more inclined to keep it as a separate article). However, community organizing ('co') is a very distinct thing from community development ('cd'). In cd, the goal is developing community. In co, the goal could be pretty much anything, but the tool is organizing communities. So, the cd article is about a goal and the co article is a bout a tool (or perhaps a methodology or practice). —GrantNeufeld 09:55, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I concur on community organizing. The article has grown some since the above post and appears to attract attention from the grassrootsy side. Community building, the article is strangly mismatched with Category:Community building the category. I'm curious how that happened. I guess we'll give it all some time. CQ 06:58, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Arise detroit logo.gif

Image:Arise detroit logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:32, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]