Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proggy programming fonts

Proggy programming fonts

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. The article's current sources do not contain significant coverage. (The Coding Horror piece only contains a few sentences, not quite significant coverage.) In a WP:BEFORE search, I could not find any more coverage other than self-published blogs, which are not reliable sources. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 05:35, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 05:35, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep (currently weak sourcing) I found a book source but couldn't verify. There's a couple of what I consider WP:RS and another. Per WP:BLOGS "Self-published sources may be considered reliable if published by an established subject-matter expert" which Jeff Atwood source is 100%, but yes it is not SIG despite Jeff using the font, as per other programmer's blogs [1]. My understanding is that although the sourcing is currently weak, we are more accommodating of open-source compared to WP:NPRODUCT. Widefox; talk 10:55, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to List of monospaced typefaces after adding an entry for the fonts there. Available sourcing is too weak to justify keeping this as a standalone article. Sources are universally user-generated or self-published and there are few details available. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 23:39, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:39, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Atwood is barely a passing mention in a list of fonts. Yeah he's an expert but nothing much about this. Andre🚐 08:23, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:06, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or *Merge and redirect to List of monospaced typefaces. I can only find blog in DuckDuckGo. 15:03, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
Delete. A few references, but they're not significant coverage ... just boilerplate lists of fonts. -- mikeblas (talk) 22:28, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. doesn't have enough sources to establish notability. Darkm777 (talk) 01:38, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Anon... List of monospaced typefaces ←Metallurgist (talk) 02:32, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]