Jump to content

User talk:Rodericksilly

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Borgenland (talk | contribs) at 18:19, 23 October 2025 (→Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion: WP:DENY). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

ITN recognition for Alan Yentob

On 28 May 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Alan Yentob, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 23:34, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Musical style

Good evening.

I reverted one of your edits on the Fleetwood Mac article adding a Musical style section. While adequately sourced, I removed it as there is not enough information here to constitute an entire section. Furthermore, section did not distinguish the different between the different eras of the band, which encompassed several different genres starting with blues. I am not entirely opposed to restoring parts of this information, but it would need to be overhauled to be suitable for inclusion. Perhaps a Musical style and influences section would be acceptable or even adding a few paragraphs about the band's legacy. Let me know what your thoughts are. Dobbyelf62 (talk) 01:09, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Biddy Baxter

On 11 August 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Biddy Baxter, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:01, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

Information icon Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Ozzy Osbourne. When you were adding content to the page, you added duplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in yellow at the top of the page. Thanks. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 10:35, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Rick Davies

On 11 September 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Rick Davies, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Curbon7 (talk) 06:25, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gareth Thomas

ABout edit warring, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gareth_Thomas_(actor)&diff=prev&oldid=1318272579 I have learnt that you cannot do more than 3 in 24 hours, and I know that I am at my limit which I will not overstep. However, you've done FOUR reverts in a few hours. My version was stable since 27th September meaning I had not touched it since that day. Would you like to self-revert and then we discuss the nationality on his talk page? Stateside Steve Happy (talk) 22:47, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Stateside Steve Happy (talk) 23:11, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

October 2025

Stop icon You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Gareth Thomas (actor). This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Untamed1910 (talk) 23:52, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Rodericksilly reported by User:Untamed1910 (Result: ). Thank you. Untamed1910 (talk) 23:53, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Rodericksilly and Stateside Steve Happy.Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:20, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Both you and the other editor involved in the above discussion are now indefinitely blocked from the (Article) namespace, as per my comments in the above discussion at WP:ANI. --Yamla (talk) 17:55, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rodericksilly&oldid=1318409682"