Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by CommunityNotesContributor (talk | contribs) at 07:49, 12 July 2025 (Uncontroversial technical requests: fix cmt position, ping Icem4k as replying to request, advise appreciated here...). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."

  • Please make sure you really need technical assistance before making a request here. In particular, if the target page is a redirect back to the source page that has only one revision, you can usually move the page normally.
  • To list a technical request: edit the Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:
    {{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
    
    This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.
  • If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
  • If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page.

Technical requests

Uncontroversial technical requests

Requests to revert undiscussed moves

I think the best status quo to return to would be move Lohgarh (disambiguation) to Lohgarh, returning to the status quo as of 27 June 2025. The history is a mess, but it looks like Lohgarh previously redirected to the dab page, and was the dab page was moved over the redirect per WP:MALPLACED. Mdewman6 (talk) 21:15, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The move history is LohgarhLohgarh, Mohali (00:20, 22 January 2025) → Lohgarh (02:41, 26 January 2025) → Lohgarh, Zirakpur (20:36, 26 June 2025). Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 00:09, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Contested technical requests

Some English newspaper/websites references using "Fakta" TOI1, TOI2, DNA, TOI3, IMDB, Amazon Prime. More are available and can be submitted if the IP is also submitting any references. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:19, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It sounds like this is definitely controversial anyway, so an RM should be strated if anyone wishes to proceed. Cheers  — Amakuru (talk) 10:26, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
But the article is still mostly about the specific compound, including the chembox. Regardless, I think this should be discussed, as the change in title is not obviously uncontroversial. Mdewman6 (talk) 23:53, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This article does not meet WP:TV and MOS:TV standards. -- Alex_21 TALK 08:59, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator needed