Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Wikipedia proposals

The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention: You can sign up to receive a user talk page invitation to participate in discussions of interest to you, see Wikipedia:Feedback request service

Wikipedia talk:Redirects for discussion

This has been brought up from time to time at WP:RFD in the past few years, so here's the respective discussion and question: Should the main RfD be redesigned to hide older active nominations from directly appearing on the main RfD page? Steel1943 (talk) 16:55, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations

With the backlog of unreviewed GANs increasing (see Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations#Is it time for quid pro quo?), should we restrict nominations displayed on the GAN page to those meeting certain criteria? 11:07, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Temporary account IP-viewer

What should the minimum criteria for granting the TAIV user right right be? 17:01, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Talk:Pope Leo XIV

Should the introduction use a comma or a semi-colon between the birth name and the birth date? 13:45, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Featured article criteria

Should understandability be added to the featured article criteria? And if so, which wording should be used?

1. It should be added to the well-written criterion as
   1. well-written: its prose is engaging, understandable to a broad audience, and of a professional standard;
   2. well-written: its prose is engaging, understandable to its audience, and of a professional standard;
2. It should be a separate criterion: 1g. Understandable to its audience.
3. Status quo: no explicit mention

—Femke 🐦 (talk) 11:45, 15 June 2025 (UTC)