Jump to content

Talk:Tariffs in the second Trump administration

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tarlby (talk | contribs) at 14:55, 25 May 2025 (Article is so biased: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

New section?

I'm thinking about adding a new "summary" or "history" section to sort of and discuss how goals have conflicted and shifted. For now there's no good place to include info like this about how negotiations are going. And the whole situation is pretty confusing to keep up with.

I'm wondering first what to call this section—maybe "history" or "chronology" or "key events" or "evolving negotiations" or another idea.

And second, if it should be in timeline or narrative format. Posting to see if anyone has thoughts! satkaratalk 03:07, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I wound up writing "Tariffs in the second Trump administration#Key events and negotiations". satkaratalk 17:05, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Propaganda

Would it be fair to say that Trump thinks foreign films are propaganda? He's said "It is, in addition to everything else, messaging and propaganda!" but in the full post it's not clear whether "it" is referring to the films themselves or the incentives by other countries. I lean towards the former because it makes more sense, but its unclear and the source doesn't mention it. Was gonna add this change but wanna ask yall first. Thanks! GiftedWithThought (talk) 21:14, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

While it's true that he said it; we really can't include every oddball thing he has said. O3000, Ret. (talk) 21:26, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Deadline thinks Trump was referring to "foreign productions" but Time, Reuters, and Guardian sidestep by including the whole quote. I think we should either exclude or include the whole quote too. satkaratalk 22:27, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Article is so biased

Not that I'm surprised considering how Wikipedia writes about President Trump, but this is just propaganda. May someone please rework this article? 2601:589:5184:8A0:D519:9982:6ED:3154 (talk) 14:18, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There's a chance you're right, but nothing will change without a specific pointer to what is biased. Tarlby (t) (c) 14:55, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]