Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Portable Database Image
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Portable Database Image (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NSOFT Clenpr (talk) 10:23, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep by criteria 1 and 3. No valid deletion rationale provided. WP:NSOFT is an essay, not a guideline. Please provide clear + valid rationale for these nominations @Clenper.
- I spent a large part of yesterday researching previous nominations that used NSOFT as rationale that were not eligible for soft deletion due to declined prod. At least 2 were likely notable due to use in teaching or common use in Java programming. The lack of justification in nominations is placing an unnecessary burden on other editors. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 11:03, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
- Could you provide at least a reference to demonstrate this article notability? Clenpr (talk) 06:57, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
- delete Two book hits, one in German, indicates this isn't a significant thing. The heck with NSOFT: it baldly fails GNG. Mangoe (talk) 12:09, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:21, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep per WP:SK#3. Vague rationale. Plus WP:NSOFT is an essay not a guideline. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 06:04, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
- Do you still think the article meets Wikipedia general notability guideline criteria? Clenpr (talk) 06:56, 28 April 2025 (UTC)