Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Webcomics

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Webcomics. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Webcomics|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Webcomics. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Webcomics/archive

Purge page cache

watch

Scan for possible Webcomic AfDs

Related deletion sorting

Comics and animation

Webcomics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:28, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of Megatokyo characters

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The main characters are already fully covered on the main Megatokyo article, and this spinout list is just overly detailed plot summaries and speculations based entirely on primary sources. Searches are not turning up any coverage in reliable sources that discuss the various minor and supporting characters of the webcomic in any way that would justify this spinout list, or allow it to pass the WP:GNG or WP:NLIST. Rorshacma (talk) 18:52, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Webcomics, and Lists. Rorshacma (talk) 18:52, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: a reasonable WP:SPLIT. Needs trimming. Remember that WP:NLIST indicates that list can be kept for navigational reasons (but adding sources and removing what seems personal interpretations is necessary; which are cleanup issues). Best, -Mushy Yank. 09:22, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - If I may ask, what navigational purposes does this list serve? None of the individual entries have their own articles to link to, and the only other article that relates to this one is the main Megatokyo article that this was split from. And I would argue that the lack of sources is not a cleanup issue, as I stated in my nom that my WP:BEFORE was unable to locate any significant coverage in reliable, non-primary sources discussing these characters. Rorshacma (talk) 15:56, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The split makes navigation more comfortable for the reader and avoids a long list per Wikipedia:SPLITLIST, which states:" If there is no "natural" way to split or reduce a long list or table, it may be best to leave it intact, and a decision made to either keep it embedded in the main article or split it off into a stand-alone page. Regardless, a list or table should be kept as short as is feasible for its purpose and scope. Too much statistical data is against policy." Notability of the set should therefore not be a concern. Part of the characters’ description is sourced in the fiction itself. Midwestern Folklore. (2005). Department of English, Indiana State University and a few other Gbooks hits seem to contain a few helpful things. Now, if you want to redirect and cut down material and everyone agrees it’s a nice enough navigation experience, feel free. -Mushy Yank. 19:38, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – I don't see any evidence in the sources that "Megatokyo characters" is an established subject of its own, that its characters have relevance outside of the encyclopedic subject of the main work, or that minor characters are mentioned by sources at all. The list is almost exclusively cited to primary sources, suggesting that this is more of a fan-wiki list than an encyclopedic one. Significant characters are described in plenty depth in the main article. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 13:48, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as well for me, and merge any salvageable details regards the characters to the Megatokyo article.Villkomoses (talk) 12:31, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – I agree with Mable's point that there's no evidence that "Megatokyo characters" is an established subject of its own. It's not notable a topic for us own separate article. Also agree with Villkomoses that anything from this article could be ported to m the main article. HenryCrun15 (talk) 21:32, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Insufficient coverage by independent, reliable secondary sources to pass WP:GNG not a established subject of its own.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:12, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all, as failing to pass WP:GNG and WP:NLIST. Shooterwalker (talk) 14:44, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.