Module talk:Lang/data

Module:Lang/data is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible module. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lang/data module.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1: 3 months

Edit request 13 December 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Description of suggested change: Ripuarian language is listed as:

["mis-x-ripuar"] = "Ripuarian", -- replaces improper use of ksh in wp_languages

but Ripuarian is not a language isolate. It is a West Germanic language as

["gmw-x-ecg"] = "East Central German".

The family code should be used as a fallback.

Diff:

Error (talk) 19:29, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps. The ISO 639-3 custodian has left Ripuarian as an uncoded language so mis (Uncoded languages) is not an appropriate language tag. We use mis in the Ripuarian language article infobox. mis-x-ripuar was the result of a discussion (such as it was) at Talk:Ripuarian language § language naming inconsistencies.

gmw-x-ecg was added as a tweak of the malformed Wiktionary tag gmw-ecg (malformed because ecg is not an IANA registered extlang).

Has there been any discussion about mis-x-ripuar? Probably not. Apparently, mis-x-ripuar only appears in a handful of pages. Do we need to keep it?

—Trappist the monk (talk) 23:16, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is uncoded itself, but we know one of the umbrella groupings has a code gmw. So, labelling everything in Ripuarian as gmw is valid and more specific than mis. Just as there is no code for Proto-Indo-European but labelling everything in PIE as ine is valid and more specific than mis, and Lang/data has ine-x-proto for the specific Proto-Indo-European.

All of this, of course, if the private code is going to be used. If not, it is better deleted.

--Error (talk) 01:41, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's the question, isn't it? Except for your recent edit, mis-x-ripuar is not in use in mainspace. So: [is] the private code is going to be used?

—Trappist the monk (talk) 14:48, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request 8 January 2025

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Description of suggested change:

Diff:

Northern Moonlight 00:22, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why? {{lang-fra-que}} was a wrapper template around this:

{{Language with name|fr-CA|Quebec French|{{{1}}}}}

Replacing {{{1}}} with text:

{{Language with name|fr-CA|Quebec French|text}}

Quebec French: text

When that template was deleted in favor of {{langx}}, ["fr-ca"] = "Quebec French" was added to Module:Lang/data so that there would be no visual changes to articles:

{{langx|fr-CA|text}}

Canadian French: text

Is there discussion somewhere that has achieved consensus to make this change? Link?

—Trappist the monk (talk) 00:43, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request 24 March 2025

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Description of suggested change: Add support for additional proto-languages, under their family's ISO 639-5 codes:

Proto-Kartvelian: ccs
Proto-Uralic: urj

I ran into the need to tag these languages while performing language cleanup in Laryngeal theory. I'm certain their articles would benefit from proper tagging, as well.

Diff:

EnronEvolved^{My Talk Page} 22:32, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

{{lang|fn=name_from_tag|link=yes|ccs-x-proto}} → Proto-Kartvelian

{{lang|fn=name_from_tag|link=yes|urj-x-proto}} → Proto-Uralic

—Trappist the monk (talk) 22:57, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]