Draft:Tech Solved Issues
| Submission declined on 18 February 2025 by Theroadislong (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 12 February 2025 by AlphaBetaGamma (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by AlphaBetaGamma 3 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 17 January 2025 by KylieTastic (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of web content). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by KylieTastic 3 months ago. | |
Tech Solved Issues is a rapidly growing tech blog that provides expert insights, reviews, and solutions to the latest tech challenges. The blog covers a wide range of topics, including the newest gadgets, software solutions, in-depth tutorials, and tips.[1]
History
Tech Solved Issues was founded by Ibraheem Taofeeq Opeyemi, with the mission of equipping tech enthusiasts and professionals with the information they need to stay ahead in the ever-evolving tech landscape.[2] [3]
Content
The blog offers comprehensive coverage of the tech world, including:
- Tech news and trends
- Gadget reviews
- Software solutions
- Tech tutorials
Official website: techsolvedissues.com
References
- ^ "Tech Solved Issues: Expert Tech Insights & Informative Articles for Enthusiasts and Professionals". Benzinga. MarketersMEDIA Newswire. Retrieved 30 December 2024.
- ^ buzzingasia, buzzingasia (Dec 30, 2024). "Tech Solved Issues: Expert Tech Insights & Informative Articles for Enthusiasts and Professionals". buzzingasia. buzzingasia. Retrieved Dec 30, 2024.
- ^ vnreporter, vnreporter (Dec 30, 2024). "Tech Solved Issues: Expert Tech Insights & Informative Articles for Enthusiasts and Professionals". vnreporter. Retrieved Dec 30, 2024.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.