Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Defect detector
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) at 20:51, 20 January 2025 (Fixing Lint errors from Wikipedia:Linter/Signature submissions (Task 31)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.Revision as of 20:51, 20 January 2025 by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) (Fixing Lint errors from Wikipedia:Linter/Signature submissions (Task 31))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was being bold and speedy keeping --SPUI (talk) 4 July 2005 03:29 (UTC)
move to Wiktionary 203.98.57.97 3 July 2005 18:41 (UTC)
- Strong keep This article is part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Trains. slambo July 3, 2005 18:49 (UTC)
- Strong keep, as it is more than just a dictionary definition. --Alex12 3 3 July 2005 18:54 (UTC)
- Keep, valid topic, not a dicdef. JYolkowski // talk 3 July 2005 19:05 (UTC)
- Strong keep, more than just a dictdef, perfectly valid article. UkPaolo 3 July 2005 19:20 (UTC)
- Strong keep Should certainly not have been nominated for deletion - please do not refer obviously notable articles--File Éireann 3 July 2005 20:33 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. This is an important, notable topic in railroading. Sanction User:203.98.57.97 for bad-faith VFD nominations intended to WP:POINT. Kaibabsquirrel 3 July 2005 19:21 (UTC)
- I agree with sanctioning user 203.98.57.97 for above reasons. --Alex12 3 3 July 2005 20:52 (UTC)
- Keep more than a dictionary def. should be kept. Jtkiefer July 4, 2005 03:13 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.