Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roderick O'Donnell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. I see no purpose in keeping this open if nobody (note procedural nomination) is expressing support for deletion. I have reviewed the page, and it does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion as a promotional page: as such it should be improved via normal editing. Vanamonde93 (talk) 18:23, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Roderick O'Donnell

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural nomination for an IP address user. I did a search and found some potential sources online, but the IP user disagrees. Please discuss. Bearian (talk) 15:51, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Biography-related deletion discussions. Bearian (talk) 15:53, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics-related deletion discussions. Bearian (talk) 15:55, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 January 13. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:05, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I attempted to transclude three times but got edit conflicts. Bearian (talk) 18:43, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Tentative keep Even in just JSTOR, his work is cited a lot. See also inclusion in https://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9789462702820/material-change/. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:52, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, History, Ireland, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:04, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:35, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. A newly created user, asserting a connection to the subject, has commented on the "proposed for deletion" thread at Talk:Roderick O'Donnell. They have been advised of this AfD discussion. Guliolopez (talk) 21:01, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am the subject of this entry: I assert nothing. I was not the author of the original entry. Ruariabu (talk) 17:10, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.