Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ModelRight
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:28, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- ModelRight (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of notability Greenman (talk) 09:39, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:21, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Agree to delete per nom. Only source goes back to the company itself. Urchincrawler (talk) 10:32, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Encoded Talk 💬 14:57, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, a web search did not turn up any independent sources. Toadspike [Talk] 10:53, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.