Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Easy Programming Language

Easy Programming Language

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable programming language. The only sources are the language's official website, and I found no online sources in English or Chinese that establish notability. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 12:33, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 12:33, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:26, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, does not help that searching for easy programming language just brings up a list of languages that are "easy"

but yeah, google scholar search[1] also seems to indicate little to no interest in the language. The current article attracts little attention and is mostly a manual for hello world. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 00:39, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It appears chinese in origin. If an editor with experience in chinese programming language could help provide info, that would be nice.

There are some sourcing in the chinese wikipedia [2], but they suffer same problem as what nom suggests Bluethricecreamman (talk) 00:42, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

delete since sourcing from zhwiki article does not use reliable sourcing, and barely any sources online. Toadette^Edit! 17:12, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~Weak~~ keep per WP:Notability (software). This language is taught in middle schools across the country. However, a more thorough search for sources is needed. IntGrah (talk) 12:56, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A quick search found these sources:

On the use of modules in the Easy Programming Language [3]
Usage and research on the Easy Programming Language [4]
A comparative study of Chinese and English visual programming [5]
I need this and so I solve it like this. Needs and tools for students and professionals of translation and interpreting in the face of the digital multilingual challenge [6]

However, they don't have open access. There are also many articles about the usage of the language, but I excluded them from here. It appears sufficient to conclude notability.

IntGrah (talk) 12:42, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: As above, cannot find any sources to indicate notability — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mgp28 (talk • contribs)