Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SAP implementation
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- SAP implementation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No real sources, reads like a manual, mostly copied from manuals? — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 10:01, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:07, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:24, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. This reads like a kind of essay or perhaps class notes or a course outline. Even with adequate sourcing, this fails WP:GNG for a standalone page under WP:NOTHOW and WP:NOTESSAY. Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: The entire article lacks sourcing, and cleaning it up would amount to blanking the page. Deletion is appropriate per WP: STARTOVER.
- HyperAccelerated (talk) 14:45, 20 June 2024 (UTC)