User talk:I'm tla
| This is I'm tla's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 7 days  |
More Gyat (if I can say that without offending anyone)
You've obviously convinced me of the merit of the Gyat article which is lingering on AfD. All good there. May I suggest another addition that might strengthen the argument for keeping it? If there were a few examples of known people (preferably WP:N and covered in this encyclopaedia) actually using the word (i.e., direct quotes); and/or more examples of serious people like John McWhorter discussing it, this might help achieve consensus. Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 18:47, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Cl3phact0, thanks for some ideas. Honestly basically all of the serious quotes I used came from the article in TODAY, I'll hunt for more. It's a bit tough. TLAtlak 15:15, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Mohammed Algoni
Hi @I'm tla,
Thank you for having reviewed my draft article.I seem not to get the referencing issue as regards my submitted draft article draft:Mohammed Algoni ,to me the referenced sources are verifiable sources. I will also love if you could clarify explicitly the referencing issue of the draft article and the way forward.
I anticipate your response soon.Thanks.
Warm Regards,
Sylvesterchukwu04 (talk) 15:19, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Asked and answered at Teahouse: none of the references establish notability. David notMD (talk) 19:02, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- As David notMD mentioned at Teahouse, there needs to be sourcing specifically about the subject, not what the subject is saying or other mentions that fall short of WP:SIGCOV. TLAtlak 02:11, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi, a shot in the dark but I saw that you were active recently in AfC. I have a draft that's been in review for nearly two months and I was wondering if you might have time to review it? My hope is that it will be an easy review, but I'd be happy to receive feedback even if it's declined. Thanks, Mokadoshi (talk) 03:01, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Has potential at a glance. I will see later, unless another reviewer passes by. TLAtlak 02:07, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
April 2024
It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Jin (entrepreneur). While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. [1] Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 18:38, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Lapse (social network)
Hello! Your submission of Lapse (social network) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 21:33, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, I'm tla. Thank you for your work on Sujin Kim. Klbrain, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating this page about a Mexican-Korean influencer! It's a brief, focussed, article, but that's fine. I've checked the NYT and Forbes México articles, and Kim is the primary subject of them.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Klbrain (talk) 16:00, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. TLAtlak 03:49, 6 April 2024 (UTC)