This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rfl0216(talk | contribs) at 18:16, 15 March 2024(Assessment (Low): banner shell, +Mathematics, +Physics, +Engineering (Rater)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 18:16, 15 March 2024 by Rfl0216(talk | contribs)(Assessment (Low): banner shell, +Mathematics, +Physics, +Engineering (Rater))
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering
The picture shows that the First-Order Bickley-Naylor function is symmetric about 0. However, upon inspection, any value of x < 0 produces Infinity because at pi/2, cos(theta) goes to 0. This results in exp[abs(x)/0] at the end of the integration range. Thus, I think the picture should be modified to properly show that the function is only defined in a useful way for values of x >= 0. 76.129.215.146 (talk) 14:10, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]