Jump to content

Talk:Structured analysis and design technique

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) at 05:38, 13 February 2024 (Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Introductory picture spelt wrong

[edit]

It appears that the introductory picture contains a word spelt wrong. I believe it should say "Function," not "Funktion." 130.56.80.103 (talk) 15:14, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. The image is in German. -- Mdd (talk) 21:31, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I saw that too, so as this is being displayed on the English language Wiki, and the other words are in English, would you be willing to update it to Function? I can fix it, but it would then be in PNG format as I cannot create SVG files. Greyskinnedboy  Talk  20:25, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If you can do it, that would be great. I have similar problems with SVG files. There seemed to be applications where you can simply alter the words of the SVG file, but I never understood who this works. You should create a new file any way because this image is also used in the German Wikipedia. -- Mdd (talk) 21:57, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

View point of text limited to software engineering

[edit]

The article describes functional analysis as "faded away" because of the arrival of object-oriented methods. This may be true for software systems, and for software specialists, but this is not true for systems analysis and systems engineering before the hardware/software separation.

At that level, there are few systems engineers actually using object-oriented methods.

How can this article be written in a more neutral way? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.226.198.190 (talk) 05:11, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]