Jump to content

Talk:Insight Segmentation and Registration Toolkit

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) at 02:37, 13 February 2024 (Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Untitled

[edit]

I'm trying to clean up this page in order to meet the Wikipedia standards. I see that the page has been tagged for cleanup since january 2007, but I would like to get some guidance on how to proceed with the cleanup.

In the meantime I'm mostly copying the style of the Qt Toolkit page, that I assume should be a good model for ITK.

Please advice.


LuisIbanez 20:09, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


"Such C++ templating means that the code is highly efficient, and that many software problems are discovered at compile-time, rather than at run-time during program execution." I don't see much proof for that. Do they provides some hard number on that ? It sounds to me that it only generates big cache-missing libraries and bloated bindings. If there is some benchmarks, it should be referenced in the article.

The claims about the effects of "C++ templating" are unsupported and should be removed.Truprint (talk) 18:47, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]