Jump to content

Talk:Unavoidable pattern

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) at 16:24, 5 February 2024 (Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Something's missing

Something must be missing, either in the definition of an unavoidable pattern or in the statement of the first example using Zimin words. Given two unique symbols, a and b, I can create an arbitrarily long strong that doesn't contain aba: ab, aaa, aaab, abbbb, aaabbb, bbaaaaa, etc., which refutes the claim that, in the example as stated, the pattern aba is unavoidable. Unless I'm missing something. Largoplazo (talk) 17:07, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This confused me for a moment too, but then I realized A and B in the pattern can relate to the same symbol in the string. If we make our unique symbols x and y instead, it's a bit clearer. 4 characters can avoid the pattern: e.g. xxyy. However 5 or more will match it, as they must contain either xyx, yxy, xxx, or yyy: e.g. xxyyy fits the pattern ABA where A=B=y. 81.132.13.71 (talk) 23:26, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]