Talk:Q (programming language from Kx Systems)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Q (programming language from Kx Systems) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Enhancement of Q

I'm confused by the last sentence:

One enhancement in Q is it provides access to database dictionaries and tables in a manner similar to APL's arrays.

Saying "One enhancement" would seem to imply an improvement over K, but what follows is something that has always been part of K. A B Carter (talk) 02:33, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming this article

I think this article should be renamed to Q (programming languate) or Q (language) or Q (computing). The current name is too long. 80.246.136.97 (talk) 15:04, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Should the notability notice be removed?

In this article 2 books about Q are mentioned, the first one of them, Q for Mortals is a published work, book-length, written by an independent party (see http://www.zoominfo.com/p/Jeffry-Borror/622641) which seems to support the argument for notability (the second book I don't know if it meets the criteria or not, I didn't look into it)

I saw that the Amazon Best Sellers Rank for Q for mortals is #1,049,156 and for IBM: Colossus in transition it is #3,660,303 (the IBM book is given as an example in the "notability" page). There aren't specific thresholds defined for Sales rank but I think it demonstrates a certain level of public interest in the topic — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ecrz (talk • contribs) 03:55, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]