This is an old revision of this page, as edited by DFlhb(talk | contribs) at 01:32, 11 November 2023(Assessment (B/Low): Computing, +Apple Inc. (Rater)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 01:32, 11 November 2023 by DFlhb(talk | contribs)(Assessment (B/Low): Computing, +Apple Inc. (Rater))
A fact from Trapeze (spreadsheet program) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 November 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the Trapeze spreadsheet introduced the idea of blocks that InfoWorld called "revolutionary"?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc.
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: It may be a little on the prolix side. On one hand, it seems perverse to complain that a Wikipedia article has too much detail; on the other hand, I think this article could be a complete product spec for designing this application from scratch! Especially for a program that was sold only between 1987 and 1989, it seems like some of the detail may be excessive. But still, the stuff is cited, and it's written neutrally, and it isn't an advertisement (it hasn't been possible to buy this software in over thirty years anyway). At any rate, this isn't a GA review. It's a perfectly cromulent article and it's a piece of computing history now committed permanently to the ages. jp×g23:56, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]