Talk:Pole–zero plot

How bout Pole-zero plots in Continuous Time?

Mykeknauff 20:39, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

as Mykeknauff said, this page is somewhat misleading as it only deals with the discrete time case.

JMatopos (talk) 08:36, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

order of coefficients

Why is it $b_{0}+b_{1}s+b_{2}s^{2}$ ? Isn't it more usual to write $b_{0}s^{2}+b_{1}s+b_{2}$ ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.167.72.124 (talk) 17:22, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Would $B(\beta _{m})=0$ be more clear than $B(s)|_{s=\beta _{m}}=0$ ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.167.72.124 (talk) 17:39, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Should also write it in product of zeros/poles format, like $H(s)=k{\frac {\displaystyle \prod _{i=1}^{m}(s-z_{i})}{\displaystyle \prod _{i=1}^{n}(s-p_{i})}}$ but with consistent variable names and meanings — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.167.60.72 (talk) 17:49, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]