Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cumulative density function

Cumulative density function

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Is this really a valid dab page as is? Hildeoc (talk) 14:40, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'd suggest converting it to a simple redirect to Cumulative distribution function because that's almost certainly what the reader is looking for, and if it isn't, they'll find enough information there to sort themselves out. This certainly isn't necessary as a dab page as it's only pointing to two things, that are in any case so closely related that they will be referred to in each other's article. Elemimele (talk) 14:46, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:50, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 06:34, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Cumulative distribution function, per Elemimele. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 06:35, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or redirect, I don't care which. It's definitely a helpful pointer from a common mistake (so common that Google Scholar claims to have some 53k hits for that exact phrase). —David Eppstein (talk) 07:16, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to cumulative distribution function. Having this page is merely a needless layer of indirection between the reader and the material they're looking for. XOR'easter (talk) 13:53, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There are a few thousand pageviews annually, suggesting that this does indeed serve some sort of navigational purpose. I have no strong feelings about keeping vs. redirecting, but deleting seems misguided with that in mind. TompaDompa (talk) 14:39, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]