User talk:AlphaCore

Welcome to my talk page!

Hello! Please leave a new message. I will respond to your message as soon as possible. Thanks and happy editing!

Also take care of the following points:

If I left you a message; please answer on your talk page, using {{ping|Username}}, {{reply to|Username}} or {{u|Username}} in your response, or add {{talkback|Username}} or {{whisperback|Username}} to my talk page. And if you leave me a message; I will answer on my talk page, using {{ping|Username}} or {{u|Username}} in my response, or add {{talkback|Username}} or {{whisperback|Username}} to your talk page.
Please post your new topic at the bottom of this page or at the bottom of the respective section, and use a new ==Descriptive heading== for new topics.
Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ":"
Sign and date your entry by inserting four tildes "~~~~" at the end of your message.
I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your talk page (or the article talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or specifically let me know where you'd prefer the reply.
Avoid personal attacks, do not troll or use this page as a chat room.
Please, always assume good faith.
If the topic is something personal, please email me and leave {{ygm}} on my talk page.
And if you are impressed by my contributions, consider giving me some WikiLove.

⇒Start a new topic⇐

Archives

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 183 days may be auto-archived by if there are more than 5.

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Onmyway22! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 05:57, Monday, July 25, 2022 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Regarding Choo Mandhirakaali movie article

Hi,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Choo_Mandhirakaali

Its mentioned that the article is declined quoting "This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources." But there are citations referred to major press like TimesOfIndia etc. Please guide us publishing the article. Eswarkotravai (talk) 03:02, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:JTRamsey/sandbox/Loyola Marymount University Emergency Medical Services

Hello, Onmyway22. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:JTRamsey/sandbox/Loyola Marymount University Emergency Medical Services, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nikhil Prasad

Hello, Onmyway22. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nikhil Prasad, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:05, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:JTRamsey/sandbox/Loyola Marymount University Emergency Medical Services

Hello, Onmyway22. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox/Loyola Marymount University Emergency Medical Services".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:00, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why tagging other accounts as my socks. It's been months Ive been waiting to edit Wikipedia and get unblocked under SPO. Got a mail that two other accounts are tagged as my socks. Onmyway22 talk 17:33, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #68433

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:54, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AlphaCore (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked because of a sockpuppetry spam ring and I have admitted and confessed the evade. It's been six months since I have not been editing and using Wikipedia. I really miss editing articles and requesting to get me unblocked. You can check my contribution and all are constructive and I assure that I will never ever repeat the same mistake again, I swear. Please do the needful to get me back to Wikipedia!! Thank you!! Onmyway22 talk 10:08, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Don't use the expression, "Please do the needful", it's quite offensive outside of India. The last sockpuppet was blocked on 2022-08-22 meaning the soonest you can apply under WP:SO would be 2023-02-22. At that point, you'll need to drop your ludicrous claim that all your contributions were constructive. You were blocked for being part of a spam ring. It would be more accurate to say none of your edits were constructive. Yamla (talk) 11:38, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Pardon. I gotta mail that some account was suspected to me for WP:SOCK. I do not know why? At that point of time, logged and requested for unblock. Sorry I thought it is been six months. Onmyway22 talk 17:48, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AlphaCore (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Requesting unblock under WP:SPO, I haven't been editing Wikipedia for six months. I understand my fault and I swear that I won't involve in any editing violations in the future. I am requesting a last chance for me to continue as an editor in Wikipedia. I assure that my future edits will be constructive. Give me a last chance please! You can keep an eye on me. Onmyway22 talk 20:16, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We don't necessarily have volunteers who can monitor you and clean up after you if need be. We need to be convinced that your prior behavior will not repeat. I don't really think you have addressed the reasons for the block. 331dot (talk) 08:39, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Checkuser data shows no evidence of recent block evasion. I think this user needs to deal with their prior ludicrous claim that all their edits were constructive. Given they were blocked for being part of a spam ring, I think they need to convince the reviewing administrator that they would no longer edit like that in the future. --Yamla (talk) 20:55, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: I assure that I will not involve in any violations, You can keep an eye on me. Give me a last chance, Thank you. Onmyway22 talk 21:11, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla I swear no violations will be done by my side! Give me a chance please. Onmyway22 talk 09:12, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"You can watch me," is not very reassuring. Please give more specifics of your future constructivity. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:35, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My future edits will be in neutral point of view that will never ever involves in any activities that violates Wikipedia terms of use and edit. My edits will be fair and I will edit wikipedia to improve my language. I swear I will not involve any violations. Give me the chance! You won’t see me in any of the Wikipedia violations. Onmyway22 talk 10:02, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra Onmyway22 talk 22:12, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot I swear I won’t repeat the prior mistakes again. Please review my unblock request! Onmyway22 talk 23:29, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot I understand the faults and I swear I won’t repeat any violation again in future that affects Wikipedia policy. Requesting to unblock me please. Onmyway22 talk 07:53, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot @Deepfriedokra@Yamla Hello there, Onmyway22 talk 08:41, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop pinging admins. It is inappropriate and will count against your unblock requests. If nobody is reviewing your unblock requests, that's your problem. Make them more convincing, address the concerns that lead to your block. --Yamla (talk) 10:51, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

AlphaCore (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Requesting under WP:SPO, I am requesting a mercy chance for me as I haven't been edited about six months in Wikipedia, As per the last reviewer, I understand that there is no volunteers to look after me, I here by assure that I will not repeat the prior mistakes again and I will never ever involve any of the activities that violates Wikipedia policies, I swear.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Requesting under [[WP:SPO]], I am requesting a mercy chance for me as I haven't been edited about six months in Wikipedia, As per the last reviewer, I understand that there is no volunteers to look after me, I here by assure that I will not repeat the prior mistakes again and I will never ever involve any of the activities that violates Wikipedia policies, I swear. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Requesting under [[WP:SPO]], I am requesting a mercy chance for me as I haven't been edited about six months in Wikipedia, As per the last reviewer, I understand that there is no volunteers to look after me, I here by assure that I will not repeat the prior mistakes again and I will never ever involve any of the activities that violates Wikipedia policies, I swear. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Requesting under [[WP:SPO]], I am requesting a mercy chance for me as I haven't been edited about six months in Wikipedia, As per the last reviewer, I understand that there is no volunteers to look after me, I here by assure that I will not repeat the prior mistakes again and I will never ever involve any of the activities that violates Wikipedia policies, I swear. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Unblock discussion

Please concisely and clearly describe how your editing merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. I won't decline so maybe someone will have a more favorable opinion, but most consider this a minimum requirement. Best-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:48, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]