Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secrets For September

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 00:11, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Secrets For September

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication that this article meets WP:BAND. No works charted, most likely unsigned, and all information in the article comes from primary sources. Significant coverage from independent sources is just not there. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 19:41, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - It seems they are new to the music scene and haven't received that much attention but I found some here (this mentions the tours and their album was produced by Yoad Nevo), here, here, here and here. It seems they are best known for the two charts and touring with other bands. The first news article I provided mentioned they played at the Q2 Academy Islington and I found additional support here. Although this link would not be considered sufficient or reliable for Wikipedia, it does have photos and mentions the other bands. Honestly, I'm divided between weak keep and weak delete because it seems it is probably too soon. SwisterTwister talk 00:04, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 18:09, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 18:09, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:BAND and poorly sourced. Cresix (talk) 22:51, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The references cited in the article are self-published blogs and as such do not count as reliable sources. The mentions in other media have been local and most likely generated from self-submitted press releases. For example: [1]. The two BBC mentions are of similar nature. Local BBC radio (in this case BBC Radio Devon) is not to be confused with the quality or status we associate with BBC coverage and the BBC brand. 64Winters (talk) 10:49, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.