Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Wilder
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 03:26, 9 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.Revision as of 03:26, 9 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Redirect to List of Charmed family and friends#Samuel Wilder --- Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 21:09, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Sam Wilder (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Charmed IS my favorite non-animated show, believe me. And I do believe that most characters deserve their articles, believe that also. I also believe that Sam isn't notable since he has only been in three episodes. I say delete and remove him from the list of recurring characters from the Charmed articles. Three episodes, that's hardly recurring. Maybe redirect him to one of the lists of Charmed characters, but I highly doubt three episodes is enough to get him his own article. TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 14:14, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. —Pixelface (talk) 14:40, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. —Pixelface (talk) 14:40, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge any mergeable information into List of Charmed family and friends#Samuel Wilder. --Pixelface (talk) 14:40, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Vanquish, err, Delete per Pixelface. — Huntster (t • @ • c) 15:26, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]- You may want to read what "per" means in deletion discussions. --Pixelface (talk) 16:01, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Satisfactory? — Huntster (t • @ • c) 06:01, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Could you mind explaining why you striked out your vote? TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 12:44, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Satisfactory? — Huntster (t • @ • c) 06:01, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- You may want to read what "per" means in deletion discussions. --Pixelface (talk) 16:01, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It's well written, and he's a noteable character on an important TV show —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kitplane01 (talk • contribs) 22:07, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Please explain how three episodes makes him notable. Being part of a famous work is never a good reason. TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 22:15, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge the main points about the character into the character list that Pixelface provided.The only sources are the episodes themselves. If the character has only been in 3 episodes then it's probably unlikely any substantial third party sources will be found. Bill (talk|contribs) 15:10, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Scratch that, the entry in the list is probably good enough already. This article can just be deleted. Bill (talk|contribs) 15:13, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to the list., as that would be a better idea. TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 21:20, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.