Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Retirement Estimator

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 21:18, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Retirement Estimator

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I prodded this with the following rationale

A search online reveals that there are lots of sites offering a tool that estimates social security benefits, or superannuation, or other forms of retirement savings, not just the one from the US Social Security site. But there are none that describe such tools in a way that would allow a suitable WP article to be written.

The prod was declined on the grounds that it allegedly "needs expansion". However, such expansion is impossible because there are no substantial reliable sources that describe this topic. I checked google web, scholar, books and news and came up empty-handed. Finding examples of these online tools themselves are not sufficient. Reyk _YO! 03:08, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:03, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:03, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Very short article that is an orphan to main space articles. Aerospeed (Talk) 00:55, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:49, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 03:41, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.