Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Contentious topics/Comparison with discretionary sanctions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia talk:Contentious topics
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dreamy Jazz (talk | contribs) at 17:50, 10 January 2023 (→Thoughts/Changes: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Thoughts/Changes

Thanks @Dreamy Jazz for getting this started. Some thoughts on reading this:

  • I believe that people have to use our alerts so or any message that conveys the contentious topics restriction is active. is not correct.
  • I think it might make sense (perhaps in a collapsed box if we're worried about length) to include the default standard restrictions. As noted certain areas can have more but since some are universal why not list?
  • I did some CE around expiry.
  • Sitewide blocks having CT protection for 1 year is status quo and so probably doesn't need to be in a list of changes?
  • I have added some content to the Appeals section.
    • I don't know if it makes sense to have the 3 standards listed out verbatim but it felt weird not including them so I did. I have no attachment to this format though.

Courtesy ping to the drafters @L235 @Wugapodes @CaptainEek. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 17:44, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  1. From Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions/2021-22 review/Implementation/Merged § Awareness of contentious topics it says When an editor first begins making edits within any contentious topic, anyone may alert the editor of the contentious topic designation using the {{Contentious topics/alert/first}} template. Only the officially designated templates should be used for an editor's first contentious topic alert ... When alerting an editor who has previously received any contentious topic alert, the {{alert}} template may be used, but any message that conveys the contentious topic designation is acceptable.
  2. Sure. Adding the standard set is a good thing, though putting in a collapse box is probably a good idea.
  3. Thanks
  4. Ah, I missed that being the case.
Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 17:50, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Contentious_topics/Comparison_with_discretionary_sanctions&oldid=1132805082"