Jump to content

Talk:Rust (programming language)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Talk:Rust (programming language)
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Caleb Stanford (talk | contribs) at 16:18, 14 July 2022 (typo). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) 03:53, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Picking this one up. Review to follow. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 03:53, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Article looks in reasonable shape. Some work required.

  • Lead
    • Last paragraph of the lead is not covered in the body. I would move all but the first sentence into the body.
       Done. 0xDeadbeef
  • Evolution (2013–2019)
    • "Rust's object system, used for object-oriented programming" Hang on. You said in the lead that it was a functional language, not an object oriented one.
       Done by rewording it to type system. 0xDeadbeef
    • Combine the first two and last two paragraphs.
       Done. 0xDeadbeef
    • Link C++
       Done. 0xDeadbeef
  • Mozilla Layoffs and Rust Foundation (2020–present)
    • Combine the first two and last two paragraphs.
       Done. 0xDeadbeef
    • The last two also need combining or folding in, but also require a bridge to avoid to sentences running starting with "On <date>..."
       Done. 0xDeadbeef
  • Hello, World program
    • Should we mention that the bang indicates a macro instead of a function?
       Done. 0xDeadbeef
  • Keywords and control flow
    • Might as well mention comments here as well, since you're using them
       Done. 0xDeadbeef
  • Expression blocks
    • "if the semicolon is omitted, the last expression in the function will be used as the return value" The last expression, or the value of the last expression?
       Done. 0xDeadbeef
  • Memory management
    • Citation required.
  • Ownership
    • Citation required.
  • Types and polymorphism
    • Citation required.
  • Cargo
    • Citation required.
  • IDE support
    • Citation required.
  • Performance
    • Merge sentences into one paragraph.
  • Adoption
    • Citation required.
  • Components
    • Can we describe the standard library?
  • Web browsers and services
    • Citation required.
  • References
    • fn 1, 104 - need access date
       Done. 0xDeadbeef
    • fn 1, 6, 7, 8, 12, 24, 38, 40, 42, 66, 69, 75, 85, 95, 96, 102, - need publisher
    • fn 34 - needs degree + university
       Done. 0xDeadbeef

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
    C. It contains no original research:
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Quite good. Putting on hold pending changes.
    Thank you, User:Hawkeye7, I suppose the use of WP:ABOUTSELF sources in the technical sections would not prevent it from passing the GA? Or is there a need to reference the book "The Rust Programming Language (Covers Rust 2018)" in addition? 0xDeadbeef 06:43, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. WP:ABOUTSELF only applies to biographies. Citing a book about the Rust programming language is precisely what is required. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 08:07, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Hawkeye7: Thanks for the review! Caleb Stanford (talk) 16:13, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Revisiting the separation between #Syntax and semantics and #Features

Thanks to 0xDeadbeef for all the work on the article :) Regarding this edit, I am wondering if we can revisit the distinction between these two sections, as I'm not really clear on it and that will help clarify where things like the Ownership discussion belong. What aspects of Rust should be described in syntax, and which in features? Should Features omit code examples, or can it also contain code?

Caleb Stanford (talk) 16:17, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Rust_(programming_language)/GA1&oldid=1098183705"